a c heterodimerizer (TaKaRa)
Structured Review

A C Heterodimerizer, supplied by TaKaRa, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 191 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/a c heterodimerizer/product/TaKaRa
Average 96 stars, based on 191 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "uniSynK: a ratio-optimized bicistronic chemically induced dimerization tool for robust induction of dendritic spine enlargement"
Article Title: uniSynK: a ratio-optimized bicistronic chemically induced dimerization tool for robust induction of dendritic spine enlargement
Journal: bioRxiv
doi: 10.64898/2026.05.02.720486
Figure Legend Snippet: The Kalirin-7 GEF domain induces a concentration-dependent increase in baseline spine volume. A, Construct and experimental schedule. Two delivery methods were used: lipofection ( B, C ) and AAV ( D, E ). B, Example confocal images of dendrites expressing mVenus-FKBP-K7GEF via plasmid lipofection. mScarlet signal is shown as a volume marker. Scale bars, 1 µm. C, Distribution of dendritic spine volumes under plasmid lipofection conditions, plotted as a function of binned spine mVenus intensity. Spine volume was estimated by deconvolution (see Methods). mVenus intensity was measured for each spine, normalized by the estimated spine volume, and averaged across spines within each dendrite. The mean mVenus intensity per unit volume at 50 ng/mL lipofection was defined as 10 a.u./μm³. Six lipofection concentrations (2–500 ng/mL) are shown in different colors. No A/C heterodimerizer was applied. Kruskal-Wallis test ( H = 81, p = 5.5 × 10 -16 ) followed by Mann-Whitney test against neurons expressing cell-filling mScarlet alone (N (spines/dendrites) = 69/6). -10 0 a.u./μm 3 , N = 85/10, U = 2853, p = 0.77; 10 0 -10 0.5 a.u./μm 3 , N = 53/5, U = 1698, p = 0.50; 10 0.5 -10 1 a.u./μm3, N = 34/5, U = 588, p = 4.1 × 10 -5 ; 10 1 -10 1.5 a.u./μm3, N = 33/5, U = 310, p = 3.1 × 10 -9 ; 10 1.5 a.u./μm3, N = 17/3, U = 96, p = 1.0 × 10 -7 . D, Example confocal images of dendrites expressing mVenus-FKBP-K7GEF via AAV transduction. Sparsely expressed mScarlet, by using a double-floxed inverted open (DIO) reading frame system in conjunction with low Cre expression, is shown as a volume marker. Scale bars, 1 µm. E, Distribution of dendritic spine volumes under AAV transduction conditions, plotted as a function of binned spine mVenus intensity as in ( C ). Four different AAV concentrations (3.0 × 10^8-1.0 × 10^10 GC/mL) are shown in different colors. Kruskal-Wallis test ( H = 55, p = 2.7 × 10 -11 ) followed by Mann-Whitney test against neurons expressing cell-filling mScarlet alone. -10 0 a.u./μm 3 , N (spines/dendrites) = 60/5, U = 1946, p = 0.56; 10 0 -10 0.5 a.u./μm 3 , N = 37/5, U = 1256, p = 0.89; 10 0.5 -10 1 a.u./μm3, N = 52/7, U = 751, p = 4.8 × 10 -8 ; 10 1 -10 1.5 a.u./μm3, N = 11/2, U = 95, p = 7.2 × 10 -5 , F, Representative images of highly branched dendritic spine (yellow arrow heads). Scale bars, 1 µm. G, Fraction of highly branched spines per dendrite expressing mVenus–FKBP–K7GEF via lipofection (grey) or AAV (red). Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney test with Bonferroni correction. Lipofection -10 0.5 a.u./μm 3 (N (dendrites) = 15) vs Cell-fill only (N = 7), U = 51, p = 0.91; AAV -10 0.5 a.u./μm 3 (N = 10) vs Cell-fill only, U = 34, p = 0.82; Lipofection 10 0.5 -a.u./μm 3 (N = 13) vs Cell-fill only, U = 0.0, p = 3.4 × 10 -4 ; AAV 10 0.5 -a.u./μm 3 (N = 9) vs Cell-fill only, U = 2.5, p = 1.6 × 10 -3 ; -10 0.5 a.u./μm 3 lipofection vs AAV, U = 60, p = 0.65; 10 0.5 -a.u./μm 3 lipofection vs AAV, U = 68, p = 0.90. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; n.s., not significant.
Techniques Used: Concentration Assay, Construct, Expressing, Plasmid Preparation, Marker, MANN-WHITNEY, Transduction
Figure Legend Snippet: AAV-based validation confirms that IRESv10-linked uniSynK reliably induces spine enlargement with minimal unintended morphological abnormalities under baseline conditions A, Schematic of uniSynK (single construct linked via IRESv10) and split SynK (two constructs). Constructs were delivered using AAV. B, (Left) Representative confocal images of dendrites expressing split SynK. For visualization purpose only, higher concentrations were used while maintaining the same delivery ratio (PSDΔ1,2-FRB-mTq, 1 × 10¹¹ GC/mL; mVenus-FKBP-K7GEF, 2 × 10⁹ GC/mL). Scale bars, 50 µm. (Right) Representative confocal images of dendrites expressing uniSynK before (−5 min) and after (35 min) application of A/C heterodimerizer. mScarlet signal is shown as a volume marker. Scale bars, 1 µm. C, Distribution of the mVenus-to-mTq expression ratio in spines for the split construct. Ratios were calculated for individual spines and averaged per cell for plotting. Cells were classified into three groups based on these ratios: within the IRESv10 range defined under 3 μg/mL plasmid lipofection (including both mTq and mVenus; ; group 2), above this range (group 1), and below this range (group 3). D, Cumulative distributions of dendritic spine volumes under four conditions: uniSynK and split SynK groups 1–3. N (spines/dendrites/neurons) = 227/29/16 (IRESv10), 27/4/2 (group 1), 175/26/12 (group 2) and 57/8/4 (group 3). Statistical comparisons were performed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov (K–S) test against the uniSynK condition with Bonferroni correction.Group 1, D = 0.44, p = 6.4 × 10 -5 ; Group2, D = 0.13, p = 0.062; Group3, D = 0.15, p = 0.26. E, F, Averaged time courses ( E ) and summary quantification ( F ) of changes in spine volume from neurons expressing uniSynK and split SynK groups 1–3. Data in ( E ) are shown as the mean ± s.e.m. Values in ( F ) represent the average between 20 and 100 min after A/C heterodimerizer administration. N (dendrites/neurons) = 29/16 (uniSynK, IRESv10), 4/2 (split SynK group1), 26/12 (split SynK group2) and 8/4 (split SynK group 3). The median (horizontal line), quartiles (boxes), and range within 1.5 times the interquartile range (whiskers) are denoted. Statistical comparisons were made using Mann–Whitney test against the uniSynK condition with Bonferroni correction. Group 1, U = 61, p = 0.98; Group 2, U = 443, p = 0.52; Group 3, U = 198, p = 8.6 × 10 -3 . * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; n.s., not significant.
Techniques Used: Biomarker Discovery, Construct, Expressing, Marker, Plasmid Preparation, MANN-WHITNEY
Figure Legend Snippet: Removal of the Kalirin-7 C-terminal region and addition of mTq does not induce significant changes in spine volume distribution or intrinsic dynamics. A, Cumulative distribution of dendritic spine volumes under three conditions. K7GEF-Cterm (original), N = 92; K7GEF only, N = 89; K7GEF only-w/ mTq, N = 172 spines. Statistical comparisons were made using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test with Bonferroni correction. K7GEF-Cterm vs K7GEF only, D = 0.069, p = 0.97; K7GEF-Cterm vs K7GEF only-w/ mTq, D = 0.12, p = 0.37. B , Time courses of the estimated absolute volume (see Methods) of spines before and after A/C heterodimerizer application, along with their averages (blue line) and s.e.m. (blue shade) for a representative neuron expressing PSDΔ1,2-FRB-mTq and mVenus-FKBP-K7GEF. C, D, Intrinsic spine fluctuation of neurons expressing PSDΔ1,2-FRB-mTq and mVenus-FKBP-K7GEF, before and after A/C heterodimerizer administration, each calculated per 20-min interval. Each plotted point represents the mean ( C ) and the s.d. ( D ) of spine-head volume changes in 24 pooled spines with similar baseline volumes. Error bars represent s.e.m. values ( C ) and the 95% confidence intervals of the estimated s.d. ( D ). Data are fitted by a zero ( C ) and to the 2/3 power of the baseline spine volume ( D ). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; n.s., not significant.
Techniques Used: Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: Combining two SynK components using IRESv10 induces dendritic spine enlargement across a broad expression range without detectable structural abnormalities under plasmid lipofection. A, Schematic of a single-vector construct combining two SynK components via IRES variants (IRESv). Three variants with different translation efficiencies were used: IRESwt, IRESv10 and IRESv12. B, Representative confocal images of dendrites expressing each IRES construct, delivered via plasmid lipofection: IRESwt (left), IRESv10 (middle) and IRESv12 (right). Scale bars, 1 μm. C, Distributions of mTq and mVenus intensities in dendritic spines under six conditions (v12, v10, and wt at 1 and 3 μg/mL) before adding A/C heterodimerizer (−5 min). Signals were measured per spine and averaged per dendrite. Gray shading indicates mVenus concentrations that induce unintended baseline changes in spine volume ( ; 10 0.5 a.u./μm 3 ). Only dendrites with background-subtracted signal intensity ≥ 0 are shown. Mean ± s.e.m. for each condition are indicated by crosshairs. Linear regression lines are shown for each IRES variant. D, Distributions of mTq intensities in dendritic spines under six conditions (v12, v10, and wt at 1 and 3 μg/mL lipofection). Only dendrites with background-subtracted signal intensity ≥ 0 are shown. N (dendrites/neurons) = 8/6 (wt, 3 μg/mL), 19/11 (v10, 3 μg/mL), 11/6 (v12, 3 μg/mL), 9/7 (wt, 1 μg/mL), 13/9 (v10, 1 μg/mL) and 14/8 (v12, 1 μg/mL). Statistical comparisons were made using the Kruskal-Wallis test (1 μg/mL, H = 0.78, p = 0.68; 3 μg/mL, H = 1.8, p = 0.41). E, Expression ratio of mVenus to mTq for the three IRES variants. Signals were measured per spine and averaged per neuron. Statistical comparison between v10 (3 μg/mL) and v10 (1 μg/mL) was performed using the Mann–Whitney test ( U = 35, p = 0.29). F, The concentration range at which SynK constructs linked via each IRES variant induce A/C-dependent spine enlargement without affecting baseline spine volume. (Top) Averaged dendritic spine volume before A/C heterodimerizer addition, plotted for each IRES variant across expression levels measured by spine mTq intensity. Data were binned in doubling intervals, with the first bin defined as ≤50 a.u., and the mean ± s.e.m. for each bin is shown. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Mann–Whitney test, comparing each variant to cell-fill–only neurons within each bin, with Bonferroni correction. For wt, - 50 a.u./μm³, N (spines) = 36, U= 1469, p = 0.13; 50-100 a.u./μm³, N = 43, U = 1853, p = 0.027; 100 - 200 a.u./μm³, N = 44, U = 2086, p = 8.3 × 10 -4 ; 200 - 400 a.u./μm³, N = 19, U = 954, p = 2.5 × 10 -3 . For v10, - 50 a.u./μm³, N = 37, U = 1586, p = 0.041; 50-100 a.u./μm³, N = 69, U = 2775, p = 0.094; 100 – 200 a.u./μm³, N = 107, U = 4303, p = 0.064; 200 - 400 a.u./μm³, N = 51, U = 1779, p = 0.92; 400 – 600 a.u./μm³, N = 12, U = 457, p = 0.57 . For v12, - 50 a.u./μm³, N = 49, U = 1851, p = 0.38; 50-100 a.u./μm³, N = 54, U = 1806, p = 0.77; 100 - 200 a.u./μm³, N = 79, U = 2844, p = 0.65; 200 – 400 a.u./μm³, N = 53, U = 1905, p = 0.70; 400 - 600 a.u./μm³, N = 18, U = 646, p = 0.80. (Middle) Percentage change in dendritic spine volume following A/C heterodimerizer administration, plotted in the same manner. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Mann–Whitney test, comparing each variant to IRESv10 within each bin, with Bonferroni correction. For wt, - 50 a.u./μm³, U = 659, p = 0.94; 50-100 a.u./μm³, U = 1352, p = 0.43; 100 - 200 a.u./μm³, U = 2723, p = 0.13; 200 – 400 a.u./μm³, U = 563, p = 0.30. For v12, - 50 a.u./μm³, U = 872, p = 0.77; 50-100 a.u./μm³, U = 1718, p = 0.46; 100 - 200 a.u./μm³, U = 3927, p = 0.41; 200 - 400 a.u./μm³, U = 595, p = 8.8 × 10 -7 ; 400 - 600 a.u./μm³, U = 33, p = 1.6 × 10 -3 . (Bottom) For each bin, the mean spine volume before A/C and the mean change in spine volume were calculated. For each IRES variant, bins exhibiting ≥15% increase in spine volume without a significant increase in baseline dendritic spine volume were identified, and the corresponding spine mTq concentration range (minimum to maximum) is indicated by markers. G, Representative confocal image of a dendrite expressing PSDΔ1,2–FRB–mTq–IRESv10–mVenus–FKBP–K7GEF before (−5 min) and after (35 min) application of A/C heterodimerizer. mScarlet signal is shown as a volume marker. Scale bars, 1 µm. H,I, Averaged time courses ( G ) and summary quantification ( H ) of changes in dendritic spine mVenus concentration in quantified as the mVenus-to–mScarlet ratio (top) and spine volume (bottom) from neurons expressing SynK constructs linked via IRESwt, IRESv10, or IRESv12, as well as an IRESv10 GEF-dead mutant (dGEF), following lipofection at 3 μg/mL. mVenus signals for IRESv12 were not plotted due to unreliable detection. Data in ( G ) are shown as the mean ± s.e.m. Values in ( H ) represent the average between 40 and 120 min after A/C heterodimerizer administration. N (dendrites/neurons) =8/6 (wt), 19/11 (v10), 11/6 (v12), 8/5 (v10 dGEF), and 3/2 (cell-fill only). The median (horizontal line), quartiles (boxes), and range within 1.5 times the interquartile range (whiskers) are denoted. Statistical comparisons were made using the Kruskal-Wallis test (top, H = 3.7, p = 0.16; bottom, H = 16, p = 2.5 × 10 -3 ) followed by Mann–Whitney test against neurons expressing IRESv10 with Bonferroni correction (bottom, wt, U = 76, p = 1.0; v12, U = 164, p = 0.011; v10-dGEF, U = 126, p = 6.5 × 10 -3 , Cell-fill only, U = 23, p = 1.3 × 10 -3 ). J, Ratio of highly branched spines per dendrite under 3 μg/mL plasmid lipofection. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test ( H = 11, p = 9.7 × 10 -3 ), followed by Mann–Whitney tests against neurons expressing cell-filling mScarlet alone (without SynK). IRESwt, U = 5, p = 8.0 × 10 -3 ; IRESv10, U = 62, p = 0.80; IRESv12, U = 31, p = 0.51. K, Spine density in neurons expressing SynK linked via IRESv10 following 3 μg/mL lipofection, before and after A/C heterodimerizer administration, quantified per 10 μm of dendrite. N (dendrites/neurons) =19/11 (v10). Wilcoxon signed-rank test ( U = 12, p =0.71). L, M, Intrinsic spine fluctuation of neurons expressing PSDΔ1,2–FRB–mTq–IRESv10–mVenus–FKBP–K7GEF, before and after A/C heterodimerizer administration, each calculated per 20-min interval. Each plotted point represents the mean ( L ) and the s.d. ( M ) of spine-head volume changes in 21 pooled spines with similar baseline volumes. Error bars represent s.e.m. values ( L ) and the 95% confidence intervals of the estimated s.d. ( M ). Data are fitted by a zero ( L ) and to the 2/3 power of the baseline spine volume ( M ). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; n.s., not significant.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Plasmid Preparation, Construct, Variant Assay, Comparison, MANN-WHITNEY, Concentration Assay, Marker, Mutagenesis
Figure Legend Snippet: C-terminal truncation of Kalirin-7 preserves spine enlargement in SynK. A, Schematic of the original SynK construct. B, Representative confocal image of a dendrite expressing PSDΔ1,2–FRB (3 μg/mL) and mVenus–FKBP fused to Kalirin-7 GEF and C-terminal regions (0.05 μg/mL) before (−5 min) and after (35 min) application of A/C heterodimerizer. mScarlet signal is shown as a volume marker. Scale bar, 1 µm. C, Time courses of changes in the mVenus signal in dendritic spines (top) and spine volume (bottom), including their averages (bold line) and s.e.m (shade) for a representative neuron expressing PSDΔ1,2–FRB and mVenus–FKBP–K7GEF–Cterm. Values are plotted as a percentage change from the baseline average. D, Plasmid construct of SynK lacking the Kalirin-7 C-terminal region. E, Representative confocal image of a dendrite expressing PSDΔ1,2–FRB (3 μg/mL) and mVenus–FKBP–K7GEF (w/o Cterm, 0.05 μg/mL). Scale bar, 1 µm. F, Time course of mVenus and mScarlet signals in dendritic spines for a representative neuron expressing PSDΔ1,2–FRB and mVenus–FKBP–K7GEF. G, H, Averaged time courses ( G ) and summary ( H ) of changes in mVenus signal in dendritic spines (top) and spine volume (bottom) from neurons expressing SynK with either K7GEF–C-terminal region (original) or K7GEF alone. Data in ( G ) are shown as the mean ± s.e.m. Values in ( H ) represent the average between 40 and 120 min after A/C heterodimerizer administration. N (dendrites/neurons) = 12/7 (K7GEF-Cterm) and 11/4 (K7GEF only). The median (horizontal line), quartiles (boxes), and range within 1.5 times the interquartile range (whiskers) are denoted. Statistical comparisons were made using the Mann–Whitney test (top: U = 53, p = 0.44; bottom: U = 58, p = 0.64). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; n.s., not significant.
Techniques Used: Construct, Expressing, Marker, Plasmid Preparation, MANN-WHITNEY
Figure Legend Snippet: mTq tagging of PSDΔ1,2-FRB does not interfere with SynK function. A, Schematic of the SynK construct with mTq fused to PSDΔ1,2–FRB and lacking the Kalirin-7 C-terminal region. B, Representative confocal images of a dendrite expressing PSDΔ1,2-FRB-mTq and mVenus-FKBP-K7GEF before (−5 min) and after (35 min) application of A/C heterodimerizer. Images of mScarlet signal are shown as a volume marker. Scale bar, 1 µm. C , Time courses of changes in the mVenus signal in dendritic spines (top) and spine volume (bottom), including their averages (bold line) and s.e.m (shade) for a representative neuron expressing PSDΔ1,2–FRB–mTq and mVenus–FKBP–K7GEF–Cterm. Values are plotted as a percentage change from the baseline average. D, E, Averaged time courses ( D ) and summary ( E ) of changes in mVenus signal in dendritic spines (top) and spine volume (bottom) from neurons expressing SynK with mTq tagging of PSDΔ1,2-FRB. Data without mTq are reproduced from and shown as dashed lines ( D ) and hollow box plots ( E ) for comparison. Data in ( D ) are shown as the mean ± s.e.m. Values in ( E ) represent the average between 40 and 120 min after A/C heterodimerizer administration. N (dendrites/neurons) = 16/9 (w/ mTq) and 11/4 (w/o mTq). The median (horizontal line), quartiles (boxes), and range within 1.5 times the interquartile range (whiskers) are denoted. Statistical comparisons were made using the Mann–Whitney test (top: U = 91, p = 0.90; bottom: U = 106, p = 0.39). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; n.s., not significant.
Techniques Used: Construct, Expressing, Marker, Comparison, MANN-WHITNEY
